Informal Coercion in the Physical Care of Patients Suffering from Senile Dementia or Mental Retardation
This article discusses under what circumstances patients who are suffering from senile dementia or mental retardation should be submitted to coercive care, who should decide about this kind of coercion, and in what legal framework it should take place. A distinction is drawn between modest (i.e. of...
Главный автор: | |
---|---|
Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
Язык: | Английский |
Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Опубликовано: |
Sage
1999
|
В: |
Nursing ethics
Год: 1999, Том: 6, Выпуск: 4, Страницы: 327-336 |
Другие ключевые слова: | B
Mental Retardation
B meddlesome coercion B modest coercion B Coercion B Senile dementia |
Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Итог: | This article discusses under what circumstances patients who are suffering from senile dementia or mental retardation should be submitted to coercive care, who should decide about this kind of coercion, and in what legal framework it should take place. A distinction is drawn between modest (i.e. of moderate degree) and meddlesome coercion. The use of modest coercion is defended. It is argued that medical personnel ought to decide exclusively about the use of modest coercion. However, no law should render legitimate the use of even modest coercion. It is conceded that to prohibit the use of a kind of coercion that is expected to take place is hypocrisy. It is argued that this is, however, an acceptable form of hypocrisy. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1477-0989 |
Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Nursing ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/096973309900600408 |