Policy Implications of the Biological Model of Mental Disorder
The current dominant paradigm of mental disorder is that psychopathology is a deviation from normal physiological functioning of the brain. This paradigm is closely allied to the identity theory of mind in philosophy, which holds that mental phenomena are identical with the physical state of the bra...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Sage
2000
|
| В: |
Nursing ethics
Год: 2000, Том: 7, Выпуск: 5, Страницы: 412-424 |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Policy
B mind-body B Mental Health |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Итог: | The current dominant paradigm of mental disorder is that psychopathology is a deviation from normal physiological functioning of the brain. This paradigm is closely allied to the identity theory of mind in philosophy, which holds that mental phenomena are identical with the physical state of the brain. The assumptions of the biological model have policy implications, regardless of the utility or ‘truth’ of the paradigm, which should be made explicit for the assessment of ethics in mental health policy formulation. The nature of mental phenomena has been debated throughout history, without consensus. Several critiques of the biological model are offered to encourage enquiring scepticism. The policy implications discussed are political conservatism, broadened rationales for forced treatment, utility in managed care, and the use of medical necessity criteria to allocate treatment. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1477-0989 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Nursing ethics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/096973300000700506 |