The development of ethical guidelines for nurses’ collegiality using the Delphi method

Background:Nurses’ collegiality is topical because patient care is complicated, requiring shared knowledge and working methods. Nurses’ collaboration has been supported by a number of different working models, but there has been less focus on ethics.Aim:This study aimed to develop nurses’ collegiali...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nursing ethics
Authors: Kangasniemi, Mari (Author) ; Arala, Katariina (Author) ; Becker, Eve-Marie 1972- (Author) ; Suutarla, Anna (Author) ; Haapa, Toni (Author) ; Korhonen, Anne (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage 2017
In: Nursing ethics
Further subjects:B Ethics
B Nursing
B Collegiality
B Delphi method
B Guidelines
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1779455216
003 DE-627
005 20211127002907.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211126s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/0969733015617342  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1779455216 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1779455216 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Kangasniemi, Mari  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The development of ethical guidelines for nurses’ collegiality using the Delphi method 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Background:Nurses’ collegiality is topical because patient care is complicated, requiring shared knowledge and working methods. Nurses’ collaboration has been supported by a number of different working models, but there has been less focus on ethics.Aim:This study aimed to develop nurses’ collegiality guidelines using the Delphi method.Method:Two online panels of Finnish experts, with 35 and 40 members, used the four-step Delphi method in December 2013 and January 2014. They reformulated the items of nurses’ collegiality identified by the literature and rated based on validity and importance. Content analysis and descriptive statistical methods were used to analyze the data, and the nurses’ collegiality guidelines were formulated.Ethical considerations:Organizational approval was received, and an informed consent was obtained from all participants. Information about the voluntary nature of participation was provided.Results:During the first Delphi panel round, a number of items were reformulated and added, resulting in 32 reformulated items. As a result of the second round, 8 of the 32 items scored an agreement rate of more than 75%, with the most rated item being collegiality means that professionals respect each other. The item with second highest rating was collegiality has a common objective: what is best for patients, followed by the third highest which was professional ethics is the basis of collegiality.Conclusion:Nurses’ collegiality and its content are well recognized in clinical practice but seldom studied. Collegiality can be supported by guidelines, and nurses working in clinical practice, together with teachers and managers, have shared responsibilities to support and develop it. More research in different nursing environments is needed to improve understanding of the content and practice of nursing collegiality. 
650 4 |a Nursing 
650 4 |a Guidelines 
650 4 |a Ethics 
650 4 |a Delphi method 
650 4 |a Collegiality 
700 1 |a Arala, Katariina  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)128778806  |0 (DE-627)37968036X  |0 (DE-576)185701760  |4 aut  |a Becker, Eve-Marie  |d 1972- 
700 1 |a Suutarla, Anna  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Haapa, Toni  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Korhonen, Anne  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Nursing ethics  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1994  |g 24(2017), 5, Seite 538-555  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)324869460  |w (DE-600)2031461-9  |w (DE-576)273866605  |x 1477-0989  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:24  |g year:2017  |g number:5  |g pages:538-555 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733015617342  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 24  |j 2017  |e 5  |h 538-555 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4008129154 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1779455216 
LOK |0 005 20211126113447 
LOK |0 008 211126||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-10-24#07B83B3D43DCF06F6A9B25E143A60280FFFB4B5C 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw