The influence of individualistic and collectivistic morality on dementia care choices
Background:If collectivistic-oriented family carers choose professional care for dependents with dementia, they risk being stigmatised as failing their obligation. This may influence dementia care choices.Research question:How may individualistic and collectivistic values influence choices in dement...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage
2019
|
| In: |
Nursing ethics
Year: 2019, Volume: 26, Issue: 7/8, Pages: 2047-2057 |
| Further subjects: | B
ethics and dementia care
B professional care B family care B Stigma B Individualism B Collectivism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1779458177 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230426132949.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211126s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/0969733018791342 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1779458177 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1779458177 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hanssen, Ingrid |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The influence of individualistic and collectivistic morality on dementia care choices |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Background:If collectivistic-oriented family carers choose professional care for dependents with dementia, they risk being stigmatised as failing their obligation. This may influence dementia care choices.Research question:How may individualistic and collectivistic values influence choices in dementia care?Method:Qualitative design with in-depth interviews with a total of 29 nurses, 13 family members in Norway and the Balkans and 3 Norwegian dementia care coordinators. A hermeneutic content-focused analysis was used.Ethical considerations:Ethical approval was obtained from the Regional Ethics Committee for Research, South-Eastern Norway, and the nursing homes’ leadership.Findings:Family domain reasons why institutionalisation of dependents with dementia was seen as a last resort: obligation towards family members, particularly parents; worry about other family members’ reactions and inability to cope with the care for the person with dementia. Social domain reasons: feelings of shame and stigma regarding dementia, particularly in connection with institutionalisation of family members.Discussion:Children’s obligation towards their parents is an important aspect of the morality of collectivistic societies. Institutionalising parents with dementia may cause feelings of guilt and shame and worry about being stigmatised and ostracised. To avoid blame and rejection, caregiver(s) try to keep the fact that family members have dementia ‘in the family’. The decision to accept professional healthcare for dependents with severe dementia or have them admitted to a geriatric institution was postponed as long as possible.Conclusion:Family care morality may constitute a significant barrier against seeking professional help for persons with dementia, a barrier based on the expectation that the family will care for their old, even when suffering from severe dementia. Hence, stigma and shame may significantly affect the provision of care. Culturally tailored information may encourage family carers to seek professional help before the disruptive influence of the disease makes institutionalisation the only feasible option. | ||
| 601 | |a Influencer | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Stigma | |
| 650 | 4 | |a professional care | |
| 650 | 4 | |a family care | |
| 650 | 4 | |a ethics and dementia care | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Individualism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Collectivism | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tran, Phuong Thai Minh |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Nursing ethics |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1994 |g 26(2019), 7/8, Seite 2047-2057 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)324869460 |w (DE-600)2031461-9 |w (DE-576)273866605 |x 1477-0989 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:26 |g year:2019 |g number:7/8 |g pages:2047-2057 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733018791342 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 26 |j 2019 |e 7/8 |h 2047-2057 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4008132198 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1779458177 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211126113501 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211126||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-10-24#7A309BACF9486DFCF23D83CD201ADA6E14679EFF | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||