The effectiveness of narrative writing on the moral distress of intensive care nurses

Background:Nursing is a profession that has always been accompanied with common ethical concerns. There are some evidences which indicate that narrative writing on traumatic experiences may improve an individual’s emotional health.Objective:This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of narrativ...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs: Saeedi, Smat (Auteur) ; Jouybari, Leila (Auteur) ; Sanagoo, Akram (Auteur) ; Vakili, Mohammad Ali (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Sage 2019
Dans: Nursing ethics
Année: 2019, Volume: 26, Numéro: 7/8, Pages: 2195-2203
Sujets non-standardisés:B Ethics
B Nursing
B Iran
B Narration
B intensive care units
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:Background:Nursing is a profession that has always been accompanied with common ethical concerns. There are some evidences which indicate that narrative writing on traumatic experiences may improve an individual’s emotional health.Objective:This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of narrative writing on moral distress of nurses working in intensive care unit.Research design:This study was a clinical trial with pre- and post-test design. The frequency and intensity of moral distress was measured by a valid and reliable questionnaire (Corely) at baseline and after 8 weeks. The intervention group was asked to write about their deepest emotions and stressful experiences in the intensive care unit for 8 weeks.Participants and research context:Using consensus sampling, 120 nurses of intensive care unit and neonatal intensive care unit of the teaching hospitals (in Iran) were invited to and were randomly allocated into the intervention and control groups.Ethical considerations:Participation was voluntary, data were anonymized, and the confidentiality of the participating nurses and their institutions maintained. The ethical approval was obtained from an IRB or research ethics committee.Findings:In total, 106 nurses completed the trial consisting of 87.75% females. The mean work experience of nurses in the intervention and control groups was 7.21 ± 4.96 and 8.28 ± 5.45 years, respectively. Independent t-test showed no statistical difference neither in the intensity of moral distress (P = 0.8), nor in its frequency (P = 0.5) between the two groups.Discussion:As nurses constantly face ethical tensions, moral distress is a phenomenon that results from the different situations of critical care units. Their concern about receiving negative feedback from the managerial level may have influenced the outcome of the intervention.Conclusion:Narratives writing by the nurses showed no effect on reducing the intensity and frequency of moral distress. It seems that due to the intensity of moral distress in clinical settings, we need to test variety solutions to reduce the problem.
ISSN:1477-0989
Contient:Enthalten in: Nursing ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0969733018806342