Rejoinder: Navigating through Troubled Language
In response to the constructive criticism of four male scholars of religious studies, this piece clarifies some of the arguments of my earlier essay, ‘Who's Afraid of Gay Theology?’. It argues for a cautious approach to identify one's gendered and sexed identity as an author within men...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group
2007
|
In: |
Theology & sexuality
Year: 2007, Volume: 14, Issue: 1, Pages: 107-112 |
Further subjects: | B
Gender Identity
B Confession B Heteronormativity B male intimacy B Homophobia B gay theology B masculinity and religion B Men's studies |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
Summary: | In response to the constructive criticism of four male scholars of religious studies, this piece clarifies some of the arguments of my earlier essay, ‘Who's Afraid of Gay Theology?’. It argues for a cautious approach to identify one's gendered and sexed identity as an author within men's studies since such self-revelation may narrow the range of possible textual readings. The unintended consequence may be lesser rather than the wished-for greater transparency of both text and author. This essay makes a few suggestions of how to navigate the difficult terrain of language, gender, social privilege, and male intimacy. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1745-5170 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Theology & sexuality
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/1355835807082707 |