Dead-Ends and New Directions: Abraham Kuyper and Contemporary VU Philosophers on the Creation-Evolution Debate

The aim of this article is to investigate how Abraham Kuyper and some late neo-Calvinists have addressed the doctrine of creation in light of the challenges posed by evolutionary scientific theory. I argue that most neo-Calvinists today, particularly scholars from the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (V...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Gomes, Jean Francesco A. L. (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado: Brill 2021
En: Journal of reformed theology
Año: 2021, Volumen: 15, Número: 4, Páginas: 327-347
Clasificaciones IxTheo:CD Cristianismo ; Ciencia 
KAH Edad Moderna
KAJ Época contemporánea
KDD Iglesia evangélica 
NBD Creación
VA Filosofía
Otras palabras clave:B Abraham Kuyper
B neo-Calvinism
B Christianity and science
B evolutionary theory
B doctrine of creation
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descripción
Sumario:The aim of this article is to investigate how Abraham Kuyper and some late neo-Calvinists have addressed the doctrine of creation in light of the challenges posed by evolutionary scientific theory. I argue that most neo-Calvinists today, particularly scholars from the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VU), continue Kuyper’s legacy by holding the core principles of a creationist worldview. Yet, they have taken a new direction by explaining the natural history of the earth in evolutionary terms. In my analysis, Kuyper’s heirs at the VU today offer judicious parameters to guide Christians in conversation with evolutionary science, precisely because of their high appreciation of good science and awareness of the nonnegotiable elements that make up the orthodox Christian narrative.
ISSN:1569-7312
Obras secundarias:Enthalten in: Journal of reformed theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15697312-bja10020