Il “maestro scomparso” nel rapporto epistolare tra Furio Jesi e Károly Kerényi = The Role of the “Disappeared Master” in the Letters between Furio Jesi and Károly Kerényi
Furio Jesi and Károly Kerényi wrote letters to each other from 1964 to 1968. The biographical value of those writings is indisputable, as they cast light on Jesi’s years of apprenticeship. This article, on the other hand, aims to consider the relationship between the two scholars as an active part o...
| Subtitles: | The Role of the “Disappeared Master” in the Letters between Furio Jesi and Károly Kerényi |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | Italian |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Salvatore Sciascia EDITO R. E.
2019
|
| In: |
Mythos
Year: 2019, Volume: 13, Pages: 1-11 |
| Further subjects: | B
Jesi Furio
B Kierkegaard B Letters B maieutic B Epistolario B Kerényi Károly B maieutica |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | Furio Jesi and Károly Kerényi wrote letters to each other from 1964 to 1968. The biographical value of those writings is indisputable, as they cast light on Jesi’s years of apprenticeship. This article, on the other hand, aims to consider the relationship between the two scholars as an active part of Jesi’s theoretical work. The key philosophical points that emerged from that exchange of letters, with a particular regard to the letters of 1965 and 1967, cast a new light on the role of the “disappeared master” that Jesi later on decides to embody. La critica concorda sul rapporto stretto, in Furio Jesi, tra opera teorica e autobiografia. Le lettere che Furio Jesi scambia con il maestro Károly Kerényi dal 1964 al 1968 sono da considerarsi parte attiva del suo corpus teorico. La crisi tra allievo e maestro può essere letta in un confronto tra l’epistolario Jesi-Kerényi e i testi della fine degli anni settanta. Si tratta di specificare quale sia la figura di maestro che Jesi attribuisce a Kerényi e che poi sceglierà di incarnare. Le lettere del 1965 e del 1967 costituiscono, in particolare, uno spunto di riflessione su tale questione. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2037-7746 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Università degli studi di Palermo. Dipartimento culture e società, Mythos
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.4000/mythos.1506 |