Calvin, Classical Trinitarianism, and the Aseity of the Son. By Brannon Ellis
In the Middle Ages, a revered theologian was considered to be one who could ‘make distinctions’. Brannon Ellis, throughout this book, has shown that he is surely such a theologian, in the very best and most helpful way. Ellis holds together—brilliantly—both the depth and breadth of the issues, conce...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Review |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Oxford University Press
2014
|
| In: |
The journal of theological studies
Year: 2014, Volume: 65, Issue: 1, Pages: 331-334 |
| Review of: | Calvin, classical trinitarianism, and the aseity of the Son (Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2012) (Fennell, Robert C.)
Calvin, classical trinitarianism, and the aseity of the Son (Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press, 2012) (Fennell, Robert C.) |
| Further subjects: | B
Book review
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | In the Middle Ages, a revered theologian was considered to be one who could ‘make distinctions’. Brannon Ellis, throughout this book, has shown that he is surely such a theologian, in the very best and most helpful way. Ellis holds together—brilliantly—both the depth and breadth of the issues, concerns, nuances, subtleties, and significant differences among a vast range of individual thinkers, movements, councils, and credal statements on the question of how the Son of God may be said to be a se—‘of himself’—yet also ‘of the Father’. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1477-4607 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: The journal of theological studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1093/jts/flu024 |