Constitutional Rights, Moral Controversy, and the Supreme Court

For over three decades, Michael Perry has helped shape our public discourse on the most contentious and contested moral issues of the day. In a voluminous body of work spanning some sixty papers and roughly one dozen books, Perry has navigated the landscape of constitutional politics with a sophisti...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:A journal of church and state
Main Author: Albert, Richard (Author)
Format: Electronic Review
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press 2009
In: A journal of church and state
Review of:Constitutional rights, moral controversy, and the Supreme Court (Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2009) (Albert, Richard)
Constitutional rights, moral controversy, and the Supreme Court (New York, NY [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009) (Albert, Richard)
Constitutional rights, moral controversy, and the Supreme Court (Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2009) (Albert, Richard)
Constitutional rights, moral controversy, and the Supreme Court (Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2009) (Albert, Richard)
Constitutional rights, moral controversy, and the Supreme Court (New York, NY [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009) (Albert, Richard)
Further subjects:B Book review
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:For over three decades, Michael Perry has helped shape our public discourse on the most contentious and contested moral issues of the day. In a voluminous body of work spanning some sixty papers and roughly one dozen books, Perry has navigated the landscape of constitutional politics with a sophisticated appreciation of the high stakes of religion, ideology, and personhood that stand at the core of the questions which most deeply divide Americans., The same holds true for Perry's latest book, Constitutional Rights, Moral Controversy, and the Supreme Court, in which he advances a theory of Supreme Court judicial review for adjudicating matters of intense moral disagreement, namely capital punishment, same-sex unions, and abortions.
ISSN:2040-4867
Contains:Enthalten in: A journal of church and state
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1093/jcs/csq004