Defending American Religious Neutrality

Reflecting in 1785 on the American Revolution and its aftermath, the radical British philosopher Richard Price lamented that most civil states corrupted religion, promoting “superstition, idolatry, and nonsense…under the idea of supporting sacred truth and opposing dangerous error.” “Would not,” Pri...

全面介绍

Saved in:  
书目详细资料
主要作者: Beneke, Chris (Author)
格式: 电子 Review
语言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
载入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: Oxford University Press 2014
In: A journal of church and state
Year: 2014, 卷: 56, 发布: 4, Pages: 783-785
Further subjects:B 书评
在线阅读: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
实物特征
总结:Reflecting in 1785 on the American Revolution and its aftermath, the radical British philosopher Richard Price lamented that most civil states corrupted religion, promoting “superstition, idolatry, and nonsense…under the idea of supporting sacred truth and opposing dangerous error.” “Would not,” Price asked, “its perfect neutrality be the greatest blessing?” The early modern liberal dream that the state might serve as a beneficent umpire in religious matters, impartially arbitrating between sincerely contested and equally worthy claims, has lost some of its allure since Price's time. Andrew Koppelman's book aims to breathe new life into its languishing spirit., It is a daunting assignment, and Koppelman completes it in a brisk 177 pages.
ISSN:2040-4867
Contains:Enthalten in: A journal of church and state
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1093/jcs/csu085