A response to Professor Moltmann
This paper is a response to Professor Moltmann’s 2011 Boyle Lecture ‘Is the world unfinished? On interactions between science and theology in the concepts of nature, time and the future’ (Theology, November 2011). I discuss three issues. First, I take up the question of the relation of science and t...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Φόρτωση...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Έκδοση: |
Sage
2011
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Theology
Έτος: 2011, Τόμος: 114, Τεύχος: 6, Σελίδες: 414-418 |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Moltmann
B Creation B science / theology B Time |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Σύνοψη: | This paper is a response to Professor Moltmann’s 2011 Boyle Lecture ‘Is the world unfinished? On interactions between science and theology in the concepts of nature, time and the future’ (Theology, November 2011). I discuss three issues. First, I take up the question of the relation of science and theology, arguing that though they may share an interest in nature neither is hermeneutically neutral, which has serious implications. Second, I raise cautiously the question of how we may provide an account of time that makes sense of the reality of the past? Third, I ask whether Professor Moltmann’s use of spatial language to describe God’s self-limitation in the incarnation is to be understood as being literal or metaphorical? |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2044-2696 |
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0040571X11418572 |