On doubting dichotomies: A response to Don Cupitt
This article is a response to Don Cupitt’s article ‘After the end of the world’, published in Theology (July 2014). It argues that doubts are always worth doubting, critical questions warrant critical questioning, that imagination is more prevalent than sceptics acknowledge, and that there are space...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Otros Autores: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado: |
Sage
2015
|
| En: |
Theology
Año: 2015, Volumen: 118, Número: 1, Páginas: 26-30 |
| Clasificaciones IxTheo: | AB Filosofía de la religión VA Filosofía |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Cupitt
B dichotomy B Critical B Agnosticism B realism / antirealism B Doubt B Scepticism B Imaginación |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electrónico
|
| Sumario: | This article is a response to Don Cupitt’s article ‘After the end of the world’, published in Theology (July 2014). It argues that doubts are always worth doubting, critical questions warrant critical questioning, that imagination is more prevalent than sceptics acknowledge, and that there are spaces that dichotomies arbitrarily banish. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2044-2696 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "After the end of the world (2014)"
|
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0040571X14551677 |