Jesus in Discourses of Dichotomies: Alternative Paradigms for the Historical Jesus

This article is an attempt at a meta-perspective on studies of the historical Jesus, by raising the question: what types of discourses are used in discussions of the historical Jesus? Drawing on an understanding of discourses as structured by dichotomies (N. Luhmann), I apply three different types o...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Moxnes, Halvor (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2013
In: Journal for the study of the historical Jesus
Year: 2013, Volume: 11, Issue: 2, Pages: 130-152
Further subjects:B dichotomy discourse difference / equality and inequality ethnicity normality and deviancy ‘we’ and ‘others’
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic
Description
Summary:This article is an attempt at a meta-perspective on studies of the historical Jesus, by raising the question: what types of discourses are used in discussions of the historical Jesus? Drawing on an understanding of discourses as structured by dichotomies (N. Luhmann), I apply three different types of discourses and apply them to different Jesus studies: the dichotomy between equality and inequality/difference, the dichotomy of normality and deviancy, and the dichotomy between ‘we’ and ‘others’. The various approaches therefore reflect different modern concerns, and, explicit or implicit, also different politics of interpretation. The discourse based on the dichotomy between ‘we’ and ‘others’ is the discourse of identity, increasingly understood as ethnicity. In historical Jesus studies the category ethnicity is used to define the Jewishness of Jesus, and the consequences of this category are problematized.
ISSN:1745-5197
Contains:In: Journal for the study of the historical Jesus
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/17455197-01102004