On doubting dichotomies: A response to Don Cupitt
This article is a response to Don Cupitt’s article ‘After the end of the world’, published in Theology (July 2014). It argues that doubts are always worth doubting, critical questions warrant critical questioning, that imagination is more prevalent than sceptics acknowledge, and that there are space...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Collaborateurs: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Sage
2015
|
| Dans: |
Theology
Année: 2015, Volume: 118, Numéro: 1, Pages: 26-30 |
| Classifications IxTheo: | AB Philosophie de la religion VA Philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Cupitt
B Imagination B dichotomy B Critical B Agnosticism B realism / antirealism B Doubt B Scepticism |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Édition parallèle: | Électronique
|
| Résumé: | This article is a response to Don Cupitt’s article ‘After the end of the world’, published in Theology (July 2014). It argues that doubts are always worth doubting, critical questions warrant critical questioning, that imagination is more prevalent than sceptics acknowledge, and that there are spaces that dichotomies arbitrarily banish. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2044-2696 |
| Référence: | Kritik von "After the end of the world (2014)"
|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0040571X14551677 |