On doubting dichotomies: A response to Don Cupitt
This article is a response to Don Cupitt’s article ‘After the end of the world’, published in Theology (July 2014). It argues that doubts are always worth doubting, critical questions warrant critical questioning, that imagination is more prevalent than sceptics acknowledge, and that there are space...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Sage
2015
|
| Em: |
Theology
Ano: 2015, Volume: 118, Número: 1, Páginas: 26-30 |
| Classificações IxTheo: | AB Filosofia da religião VA Filosofia |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Cupitt
B Imaginação B dichotomy B Critical B Agnosticism B realism / antirealism B Doubt B Scepticism |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Recurso Electrónico
|
| Resumo: | This article is a response to Don Cupitt’s article ‘After the end of the world’, published in Theology (July 2014). It argues that doubts are always worth doubting, critical questions warrant critical questioning, that imagination is more prevalent than sceptics acknowledge, and that there are spaces that dichotomies arbitrarily banish. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2044-2696 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "After the end of the world (2014)"
|
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0040571X14551677 |