On doubting dichotomies: A response to Don Cupitt
This article is a response to Don Cupitt’s article ‘After the end of the world’, published in Theology (July 2014). It argues that doubts are always worth doubting, critical questions warrant critical questioning, that imagination is more prevalent than sceptics acknowledge, and that there are space...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Другие авторы: | |
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Sage
2015
|
| В: |
Theology
Год: 2015, Том: 118, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 26-30 |
| Индексация IxTheo: | AB Философия религии VA Философия |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Cupitt
B dichotomy B Critical B Agnosticism B Воображение B realism / antirealism B Doubt B Scepticism |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Электронный ресурс
|
| Итог: | This article is a response to Don Cupitt’s article ‘After the end of the world’, published in Theology (July 2014). It argues that doubts are always worth doubting, critical questions warrant critical questioning, that imagination is more prevalent than sceptics acknowledge, and that there are spaces that dichotomies arbitrarily banish. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2044-2696 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "After the end of the world (2014)"
|
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0040571X14551677 |