Moral rights and the meaning of torture: a response to Nigel Biggar
This article challenges Nigel Biggar’s claim that there are no natural moral rights. Focusing on Biggar’s analysis of torture, I argue that he does not give adequate consideration to the possibility of intrinsically wrong actions. This oversight not only leads to a problematic, consequentialist anal...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
SAGE Publishing
2021
|
| Dans: |
Anglican theological review
Année: 2021, Volume: 103, Numéro: 4, Pages: 409-415 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Human Rights
B Torture B Moral Theology B natural rights B Consequentialism |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | This article challenges Nigel Biggar’s claim that there are no natural moral rights. Focusing on Biggar’s analysis of torture, I argue that he does not give adequate consideration to the possibility of intrinsically wrong actions. This oversight not only leads to a problematic, consequentialist analysis of torture—it also weakens his argument against the possibility of absolute rights. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2163-6214 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Anglican theological review
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/00033286211029664 |