Moral rights and the meaning of torture: a response to Nigel Biggar
This article challenges Nigel Biggar’s claim that there are no natural moral rights. Focusing on Biggar’s analysis of torture, I argue that he does not give adequate consideration to the possibility of intrinsically wrong actions. This oversight not only leads to a problematic, consequentialist anal...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Caricamento...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Pubblicazione: |
SAGE Publishing
2021
|
| In: |
Anglican theological review
Anno: 2021, Volume: 103, Fascicolo: 4, Pagine: 409-415 |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
Human Rights
B Torture B Moral Theology B natural rights B Consequentialism |
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Riepilogo: | This article challenges Nigel Biggar’s claim that there are no natural moral rights. Focusing on Biggar’s analysis of torture, I argue that he does not give adequate consideration to the possibility of intrinsically wrong actions. This oversight not only leads to a problematic, consequentialist analysis of torture—it also weakens his argument against the possibility of absolute rights. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2163-6214 |
| Comprende: | Enthalten in: Anglican theological review
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/00033286211029664 |