Genesis and Exodus as Conceptually Independent, Competing Origin Myths?

Against Konrad Schmid’s thesis that the pre-P ancestral and Exodus traditions existed as competing origin myths that were conceptually independent from each other, this article argues that this conceptual independence is difficult to prove in the context of the ancient Israelites’ oral-written cultu...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Hong, K. P. (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Caricamento...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Pubblicazione: De Gruyter 2021
In: Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft
Anno: 2021, Volume: 133, Fascicolo: 4, Pagine: 427-441
(sequenze di) soggetti normati:B Jakob, Personaggio biblico / Mito / Origine (Filosofia) / Bibel. Exodus / Bible. Pentateuch, Bibel. Pentateuch
Notazioni IxTheo:HB Antico Testamento
Accesso online: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descrizione
Riepilogo:Against Konrad Schmid’s thesis that the pre-P ancestral and Exodus traditions existed as competing origin myths that were conceptually independent from each other, this article argues that this conceptual independence is difficult to prove in the context of the ancient Israelites’ oral-written culture. Moreover, societal negotiation about the past should not be misconstrued as a sign of traditions’ conceptual independence. Competition between origin stories, or selective emphasis on one story over another, does not indicate their conceptual independence.
ISSN:1613-0103
Comprende:Enthalten in: Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1515/zaw-2021-4001