He Who Pays the Piper Calls the Tune: Big Data, Philanthrocapitalism, and the Demise of the Historical Study of Religions

The recent digital turn has had an unprecedented impact on the identity of the academic disciplines that study religions. Expectedly, this shift has brought about a dramatic change in the power dynamics between the main research actors and funders. In particular, historians and humanist scholars hav...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Ambasciano, Leonardo (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Caricamento...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Pubblicazione: Brill 2022
In: Method & theory in the study of religion
Anno: 2022, Volume: 34, Fascicolo: 1/2, Pagine: 182-209
(sequenze di) soggetti normati:B Scienze religiose / Etica della scienza / Dati di massa / Filantropia / Capitalismo / Digital humanities
Notazioni IxTheo:AA Scienze religiose
NCJ Etica della scienza
ZG Scienza dei media; Digitalità; Scienza della comunicazione
Altre parole chiave:B historical study of religion
B The John Templeton Foundation
B Dati di massa
B neoliberal academia
B cognitive science of religion
B Philanthrocapitalism
Accesso online: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descrizione
Riepilogo:The recent digital turn has had an unprecedented impact on the identity of the academic disciplines that study religions. Expectedly, this shift has brought about a dramatic change in the power dynamics between the main research actors and funders. In particular, historians and humanist scholars have taken the brunt, mostly replaced by data scientists, software engineers, statisticians, psychologists, anthropologists, and biologists alike. Consequently, multimillion-dollar projects aimed at testing historical hypotheses and massive agent-based simulations have been implemented on shaky methodological and epistemological grounds. Concurrently, in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, private religious bodies have increasingly replaced public funding, raising important but still unaddressed moral questions about transparency, independence, and potential conflicts of interests. The present article explores the ethically troubling relationship between the boom of Big Data and computational approaches to the study of religions past and present and the infiltration of religious philanthrocapitalism in contemporary neoliberal academia.
ISSN:1570-0682
Riferimento:Kritik in "Paying the Piper: History, Humanities, and the Scientific Study of Religion (2023)"
Comprende:Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341527