Getting God Out of Our (Modal) Business
Some hold that if we can imagine God creating a world in which a particular proposition (p) is true, then we can conclude that p is possible. I argue that such appeals to God can’t provide us with a guide to possibility. For either God’s powers aren’t co-extensive with the possible or they are. And...
1. VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Veröffentlicht: |
Springer Netherlands
2009
|
In: |
Sophia
Jahr: 2009, Band: 48, Heft: 4, Seiten: 379-391 |
weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Conceivability
B Possibility B Euthyphro’s Dilemma B God |
Online Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Zusammenfassung: | Some hold that if we can imagine God creating a world in which a particular proposition (p) is true, then we can conclude that p is possible. I argue that such appeals to God can’t provide us with a guide to possibility. For either God’s powers aren’t co-extensive with the possible or they are. And if they are, these appeals either beg the question or court a version of Euthyphro’s Dilemma. Some may argue that such appeals were only intended to prompt us to think broadly about the modal claim at issue. I argue instead that these appeals must be understood as more than mere prompts. For it is these appeals that would, if successful, render the conceivability principle viable. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1873-930X |
Enthält: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11841-009-0138-z |