Moral managers and business sanctuaries

Richard Konrad claims that businessmen are guilty of adhering to a vicious form of ethical relativism. In practice, the relativism takes the form of doing an act which ordinarily would be called wrong and then claiming that the act is right or justified because it falls under a special set of codes...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Roberts, David (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 1986
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 1986, Volume: 5, Issue: 3, Pages: 203-208
Further subjects:B Moral Manager
B Business Ethic
B Moral Criticism
B Ethical Relativism
B Economic Growth
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1785596535
003 DE-627
005 20220112043420.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s1986 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/BF00383626  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785596535 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785596535 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Roberts, David  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Roberts, David  |a Rūbirts, Dāvīd 
245 1 0 |a Moral managers and business sanctuaries 
264 1 |c 1986 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Richard Konrad claims that businessmen are guilty of adhering to a vicious form of ethical relativism. In practice, the relativism takes the form of doing an act which ordinarily would be called wrong and then claiming that the act is right or justified because it falls under a special set of codes (business ethics) which preempt ordinary ones. These codes or business ethics establish ‘moral sanctuaries’ for businessmen. Konrad examines three versions of the sanctuary position, argues that they fail, and concludes that the position is untenable. In this article it is claimed that Konrad is in error, that upon closer examination the three versions do provide justification for businessmen claiming relief from moral criticism. 
650 4 |a Moral Manager 
650 4 |a Moral Criticism 
650 4 |a Ethical Relativism 
650 4 |a Business Ethic 
650 4 |a Economic Growth 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1982  |g 5(1986), 3, Seite 203-208  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:5  |g year:1986  |g number:3  |g pages:203-208 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25071576  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383626  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 5  |j 1986  |e 3  |h 203-208 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033655409 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785596535 
LOK |0 005 20220112043420 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-31#5335B63BAB23586021487B2E7A9A7D294B3B8ACB 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25071576 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw