“Ought” implies “can”, or, the moral relevance of a theory of the firm
Since ought implies can, i.e., one cannot be obligated to do what one cannot do, the question of corporate responsibility cannot be discussed intelligibly without an inquiry into the range of corporate or managerial discretion. Hence, the moral relevance of a theory of the firm. Within classical or...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
1988
|
| In: |
Journal of business ethics
Year: 1988, Volume: 7, Issue: 1, Pages: 23-28 |
| Further subjects: | B
Corporate Responsibility
B Capitalist Society B Managerial Discretion B Economic Theory B Economic Growth |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |