The indefensibility of insider trading
The article, “Inside Trading Revisited,” has taken the stance that insider trading is neither unethical nor economically inefficient. Attacking my arguments to the contrary developed in an earlier article, ‘The Ethics of Inside Trading’ (Journal of Business Ethics, 1989) this article constructs care...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
1991
|
| В: |
Journal of business ethics
Год: 1991, Том: 10, Выпуск: 9, Страницы: 729-731 |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Careful Argument
B Inside Trading B Business Ethic B Early Article B Economic Growth |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Итог: | The article, “Inside Trading Revisited,” has taken the stance that insider trading is neither unethical nor economically inefficient. Attacking my arguments to the contrary developed in an earlier article, ‘The Ethics of Inside Trading’ (Journal of Business Ethics, 1989) this article constructs careful arguments and even appeals to Adam Smith to justify its conclusions. In my response to this article I shall clarify my position as well as that of Smith to support my counter-contention that insider trading is both unethical and inefficient. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1573-0697 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Journal of business ethics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/BF00705879 |