Corporate Governance Practices: A Proposed Policy Incentive Regime to Facilitate Internal Investigations and Self-Reporting of Criminal Activities
Since the mid-1980s, internal corporate investigations have become commonplace in the U.S., with an upsurge occurring as a result of the corporate scandals of 2001–02 involving Adelphi Communications Corporation, Enron, Merck & Company, Riggs Bank, and other companies accused of financial malfea...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2009
|
| In: |
Journal of business ethics
Year: 2009, Volume: 87, Issue: 1, Pages: 333-351 |
| Further subjects: | B
Securities and Exchange Commission
B U.S. Sentencing Commission B Sarbanes–Oxley Act B Corporate governance B ethics programs B attorney–client privilege B U.S. Department of Justice B work product protection B compliance programs B Organizational Sentencing Guidelines |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | Since the mid-1980s, internal corporate investigations have become commonplace in the U.S., with an upsurge occurring as a result of the corporate scandals of 2001–02 involving Adelphi Communications Corporation, Enron, Merck & Company, Riggs Bank, and other companies accused of financial malfeasance. After an introduction, this article first presents the U.S. public policy framework (as implemented through the U.S. Sentencing Commission, the U.S. Department of Justice, and the Securities and Exchange Commission) encouraging the use of corporate internal investigations and self-reporting of these results to federal authorities; second, evaluates this framework, identifying the public policy issues inhibiting companies from using corporate internal investigations and self-reporting significant results; third, proposes a policy incentive regime which attempts to ameliorate these outstanding issues; and fourth, offer policy recommendations and suggestions for further research on this topic, including increasing the maximum deduction in the Organizational Sentencing Guidelines Culpability Score available to a firm for development of an Effective Compliance and Ethics Program (from 3 to 5 points), and self-reporting the results of an internal investigation (from 5 to 7 points); evaluating the effectiveness of these enhancements in legal incentives over a period of 5–7 years after implementation; instituting a formal federal government effort to educate the American business community on the corporate reputation (and financial) benefits of an effective compliance program; and protecting attorney–client privilege and work product protection, through legislative action, to encourage company executives and directors to utilize independent, outside attorneys to conduct fair, comprehensive, and impartial internal investigations. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1573-0697 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of business ethics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s10551-008-9802-4 |