Leadership Manipulation and Ethics in Storytelling

This article focuses on exerting influence in leadership, namely manipulation in storytelling. Manipulation is usually considered an unethical approach to leadership. We will argue that manipulation is a more complex phenomenon than just an unethical way of acting in leadership. We will demonstrate...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Authors: Auvinen, Tommi P. (Author) ; Lämsä, Anna-Maija (Author) ; Sintonen, Teppo (Author) ; Takala, Tuomo (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado em: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2013
Em: Journal of business ethics
Ano: 2013, Volume: 116, Número: 2, Páginas: 415-431
Outras palavras-chave:B Ethics
B Leadership
B Narration
B Narrative
B Storytelling
B Manipulação
B Unethical
B Social Constructionism
Acesso em linha: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descrição
Resumo:This article focuses on exerting influence in leadership, namely manipulation in storytelling. Manipulation is usually considered an unethical approach to leadership. We will argue that manipulation is a more complex phenomenon than just an unethical way of acting in leadership. We will demonstrate through an empirical qualitative study that there are various types of manipulation through storytelling. This article makes a contribution to the literature on manipulation through leadership storytelling, offering a more systematic empirical analysis and a more nuanced view of the topic than previously existed by outlining how managers engage in manipulative storytelling and what kind of ethics they link to their manipulation in leadership. Four types of manipulation in storytelling are identified in the study: humorous, pseudo-participative, seductive and pseudo-empathetic. From an ethical perspective, we will show that manipulation is not always self-evidently reprehensible. We will conclude that the dominant ethical justification for manipulation stems from its consequences.
ISSN:1573-0697
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: Journal of business ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1454-8