Reasons and Value – in Defence of the Buck-Passing Account

In this article, I will defend the so-called “buck-passing” theory of value. According to this theory, claims about the value of an object refer to the reason-providing properties of the object. The concept of value can thus be analyzed in terms of reasons and the properties of objects that provide...

全面介绍

Saved in:  
书目详细资料
主要作者: Suikkanen, Jussi (Author)
格式: 电子 文件
语言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
载入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2005
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2005, 卷: 7, 发布: 5, Pages: 513-535
Further subjects:B buck-passing account
B Value
B Reasons
B Practical rationality
B normative concepts
B theory of action
在线阅读: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1785693263
003 DE-627
005 20220112044053.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10677-005-7107-6  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785693263 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785693263 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Suikkanen, Jussi  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Reasons and Value – in Defence of the Buck-Passing Account 
264 1 |c 2005 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In this article, I will defend the so-called “buck-passing” theory of value. According to this theory, claims about the value of an object refer to the reason-providing properties of the object. The concept of value can thus be analyzed in terms of reasons and the properties of objects that provide them for us. Reasons in this context are considerations that count in favour of certain attitudes. There are four other possibilities of how the connection between reasons and value might be formulated. For example, we can claim that value is a property that provides us with reasons to choose an option that has this property. I argue that none of these four other options can ultimately be defended, and therefore the buck-passing account is the one we ought to accept as the correct one. The case for the buck-passing account becomes even stronger, when we examine the weak points of the most pressing criticism against this account thus far. 
650 4 |a Value 
650 4 |a theory of action 
650 4 |a Reasons 
650 4 |a Practical rationality 
650 4 |a normative concepts 
650 4 |a buck-passing account 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical theory and moral practice  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998  |g 7(2005), 5, Seite 513-535  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320527093  |w (DE-600)2015306-5  |w (DE-576)104558555  |x 1572-8447  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:7  |g year:2005  |g number:5  |g pages:513-535 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25733599  |x JSTOR 
856 |u https://philpapers.org/archive/SUIRAV.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-005-7107-6  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 7  |j 2005  |e 5  |h 513-535 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033752161 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785693263 
LOK |0 005 20220112044053 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#34A787C7976C6BD70991FDB1BB3ADF1119D17A12 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25733599 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw