Acts 2.36 and the Continuity of Lukan Christology
Acts 2.36 has caused problems for biblical interpreters both ancient and modern. This article examines the various readings and different hermeneutical strategies in the history of interpretation in order to situate the verse within its requisite interpretive context, Luke–Acts. Subsequently, an int...
1. VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2007
|
In: |
New Testament studies
Jahr: 2007, Band: 53, Heft: 1, Seiten: 37-56 |
Online Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallele Ausgabe: | Elektronisch
|
Zusammenfassung: | Acts 2.36 has caused problems for biblical interpreters both ancient and modern. This article examines the various readings and different hermeneutical strategies in the history of interpretation in order to situate the verse within its requisite interpretive context, Luke–Acts. Subsequently, an interpretation of Acts 2.36 is offered in which the verse is seen to express, rather than contradict, Lukan christology. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-8145 |
Enthält: | Enthalten in: New Testament studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0028688507000033 |