A Text-Critical Study of John 1.34
Scholars continue to divide over whether John the Baptist acclaims Jesus as ‘the Son of God’ or ‘the Chosen One of God’ at John 1.34. This article argues that transcriptional and intrinsic probabilities, supported by the testimony of a few early manuscripts, favour the latter reading. However, in ad...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2009
|
| In: |
New Testament studies
Year: 2009, Volume: 55, Issue: 1, Pages: 22-34 |
| Further subjects: | B
Textual Criticism
B John 1.34 B Christology B Chosen One B John the Baptist B Son of God |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1785739409 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221219190724.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0028688509000010 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1785739409 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785739409 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Quek, Tze-Ming |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Text-Critical Study of John 1.34 |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2009 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Scholars continue to divide over whether John the Baptist acclaims Jesus as ‘the Son of God’ or ‘the Chosen One of God’ at John 1.34. This article argues that transcriptional and intrinsic probabilities, supported by the testimony of a few early manuscripts, favour the latter reading. However, in adopting this reading, the claims that (a) the variation took place in the course of a battle against adoptionism and (b) ‘the Chosen One of God’ supplies corroboration that the original tradition underlying the Synoptic baptismal accounts was based solely on Isa 42.1, are found to be unnecessary and methodologically problematic respectively. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Christology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a John the Baptist | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Textual Criticism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Chosen One | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Son of God | |
| 650 | 4 | |a John 1.34 | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t New Testament studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1954 |g 55(2009), 1, Seite 22-34 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)300895283 |w (DE-600)1483312-8 |w (DE-576)079165583 |x 1469-8145 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:55 |g year:2009 |g number:1 |g pages:22-34 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n elektronische Ausgabe |w (DE-627)1646182219 |k Electronic | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688509000010 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/new-testament-studies/article/textcritical-study-of-john-134/9B7556B5C9D8EFF96D26AB8ABAD50E6F |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo |a BIIN | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 55 |j 2009 |e 1 |h 22-34 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| BIB | |a 1 | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4033801944 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1785739409 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112044350 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-01-05#E8A596C09315BD4FD181B72C2C0173E6A1CAFFC9 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| SUB | |a BIB | ||