Choosing What Is Advantageous: The Relationship between Epideictic and Deliberative Syncrisis in Hebrews
This study examines deliberative syncrisis and its relationship to epideictic syncrisis in Hebrews, with a view to addressing the question of whether the rhetoric of Hebrews is ultimately epideictic or deliberative in its overall tenor and aim. Building on a previous study of epideictic syncrisis in...
Κύριοι συγγραφείς: | ; |
---|---|
Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Έκδοση: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2012
|
Στο/Στη: |
New Testament studies
Έτος: 2012, Τόμος: 58, Τεύχος: 3, Σελίδες: 379-400 |
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Hebrews
B Epideictic B Rhetoric B syncrisis B synkrisis B deliberative |
Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Σύνοψη: | This study examines deliberative syncrisis and its relationship to epideictic syncrisis in Hebrews, with a view to addressing the question of whether the rhetoric of Hebrews is ultimately epideictic or deliberative in its overall tenor and aim. Building on a previous study of epideictic syncrisis in Hebrews, the study argues that epideictic syncrisis is consistently in service in Hebrews to deliberative syncrisis, providing it with both the logical premise and the topical theme by which it advances the argument. This relationship is key, the study argues, both to Hebrews' structure and to its aim, which are decidedly deliberative in nature. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-8145 |
Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: New Testament studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0028688512000057 |