Galatians and the Progymnasmata on Refuting a Law: A Neglected Aspect of Pauline Rhetoric

The structure, flow, and logic of Paul's argumentation in Galatians continues to be a subject of debate as scholars seek to read Paul's statements about the law, works of the law, and other aspects of Judaism within a framework that appreciates both the diverse nature of first-century Juda...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gordley, Matthew E. 1972- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Eisenbrauns 2015
In: Journal for the study of Paul and his letters
Year: 2015, Volume: 5, Issue: 1, Pages: 21-39
Further subjects:B Epideictic rhetoric
B Forensic rhetoric
B Refutation
B Rhetorical criticism
B Classical rhetoric
B Rhetorical argument
B Torah
B Deliberative rhetoric
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:The structure, flow, and logic of Paul's argumentation in Galatians continues to be a subject of debate as scholars seek to read Paul's statements about the law, works of the law, and other aspects of Judaism within a framework that appreciates both the diverse nature of first-century Judaism and Paul's appropriation of his own Jewish heritage. Scholars have also sought to read Paul's letter to the Galatians in light of first-century Greco-Roman rhetorical strategies and conventions. This essay contributes to these discussions by looking at Galatians from an angle that has not yet been considered: the first-century A.D. progymnasmata exercise on the introduction and refutation of a law (νόμου εἰσφορά). This specific compositional exercise drew on the skills mastered in earlier exercises as students utilized compositional and rhetorical skills to persuade the reader (an imaginary audience) to enact or abandon a particular law based on the topics of legality, possibility, advantage, and appropriateness. By reading Galatians through the lens of this particular exercise, it is possible to appreciate the extent to which Paul utilized conventional forms of argumentation about the application of existing laws. This sort of reading contributes to a thicker description of Paul's use of elements of ancient rhetoric.
ISSN:2576-7941
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal for the study of Paul and his letters
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2307/26371733