Choosing What Is Advantageous: The Relationship between Epideictic and Deliberative Syncrisis in Hebrews

This study examines deliberative syncrisis and its relationship to epideictic syncrisis in Hebrews, with a view to addressing the question of whether the rhetoric of Hebrews is ultimately epideictic or deliberative in its overall tenor and aim. Building on a previous study of epideictic syncrisis in...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin, Michael W. 1971- (Autor) ; Whitlark, Jason A. (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado: Cambridge Univ. Press 2012
En: New Testament studies
Año: 2012, Volumen: 58, Número: 3, Páginas: 379-400
Otras palabras clave:B Hebrews
B Epideictic
B Rhetoric
B syncrisis
B synkrisis
B deliberative
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descripción
Sumario:This study examines deliberative syncrisis and its relationship to epideictic syncrisis in Hebrews, with a view to addressing the question of whether the rhetoric of Hebrews is ultimately epideictic or deliberative in its overall tenor and aim. Building on a previous study of epideictic syncrisis in Hebrews, the study argues that epideictic syncrisis is consistently in service in Hebrews to deliberative syncrisis, providing it with both the logical premise and the topical theme by which it advances the argument. This relationship is key, the study argues, both to Hebrews' structure and to its aim, which are decidedly deliberative in nature.
ISSN:1469-8145
Obras secundarias:Enthalten in: New Testament studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0028688512000057