Choosing What Is Advantageous: The Relationship between Epideictic and Deliberative Syncrisis in Hebrews
This study examines deliberative syncrisis and its relationship to epideictic syncrisis in Hebrews, with a view to addressing the question of whether the rhetoric of Hebrews is ultimately epideictic or deliberative in its overall tenor and aim. Building on a previous study of epideictic syncrisis in...
Auteurs: | ; |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2012
|
Dans: |
New Testament studies
Année: 2012, Volume: 58, Numéro: 3, Pages: 379-400 |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Hebrews
B Epideictic B Rhetoric B syncrisis B synkrisis B deliberative |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | This study examines deliberative syncrisis and its relationship to epideictic syncrisis in Hebrews, with a view to addressing the question of whether the rhetoric of Hebrews is ultimately epideictic or deliberative in its overall tenor and aim. Building on a previous study of epideictic syncrisis in Hebrews, the study argues that epideictic syncrisis is consistently in service in Hebrews to deliberative syncrisis, providing it with both the logical premise and the topical theme by which it advances the argument. This relationship is key, the study argues, both to Hebrews' structure and to its aim, which are decidedly deliberative in nature. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-8145 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: New Testament studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0028688512000057 |