Choosing What Is Advantageous: The Relationship between Epideictic and Deliberative Syncrisis in Hebrews

This study examines deliberative syncrisis and its relationship to epideictic syncrisis in Hebrews, with a view to addressing the question of whether the rhetoric of Hebrews is ultimately epideictic or deliberative in its overall tenor and aim. Building on a previous study of epideictic syncrisis in...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Authors: Martin, Michael W. 1971- (Author) ; Whitlark, Jason A. (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado em: Cambridge Univ. Press 2012
Em: New Testament studies
Ano: 2012, Volume: 58, Número: 3, Páginas: 379-400
Outras palavras-chave:B Hebrews
B Epideictic
B Rhetoric
B syncrisis
B synkrisis
B deliberative
Acesso em linha: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descrição
Resumo:This study examines deliberative syncrisis and its relationship to epideictic syncrisis in Hebrews, with a view to addressing the question of whether the rhetoric of Hebrews is ultimately epideictic or deliberative in its overall tenor and aim. Building on a previous study of epideictic syncrisis in Hebrews, the study argues that epideictic syncrisis is consistently in service in Hebrews to deliberative syncrisis, providing it with both the logical premise and the topical theme by which it advances the argument. This relationship is key, the study argues, both to Hebrews' structure and to its aim, which are decidedly deliberative in nature.
ISSN:1469-8145
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: New Testament studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0028688512000057