Choosing What Is Advantageous: The Relationship between Epideictic and Deliberative Syncrisis in Hebrews

This study examines deliberative syncrisis and its relationship to epideictic syncrisis in Hebrews, with a view to addressing the question of whether the rhetoric of Hebrews is ultimately epideictic or deliberative in its overall tenor and aim. Building on a previous study of epideictic syncrisis in...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:  
Библиографические подробности
Главные авторы: Martin, Michael W. 1971- (Автор) ; Whitlark, Jason A. (Автор)
Формат: Электронный ресурс Статья
Язык:Английский
Проверить наличие: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Загрузка...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Опубликовано: Cambridge Univ. Press 2012
В: New Testament studies
Год: 2012, Том: 58, Выпуск: 3, Страницы: 379-400
Другие ключевые слова:B Hebrews
B Epideictic
B Rhetoric
B syncrisis
B synkrisis
B deliberative
Online-ссылка: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Описание
Итог:This study examines deliberative syncrisis and its relationship to epideictic syncrisis in Hebrews, with a view to addressing the question of whether the rhetoric of Hebrews is ultimately epideictic or deliberative in its overall tenor and aim. Building on a previous study of epideictic syncrisis in Hebrews, the study argues that epideictic syncrisis is consistently in service in Hebrews to deliberative syncrisis, providing it with both the logical premise and the topical theme by which it advances the argument. This relationship is key, the study argues, both to Hebrews' structure and to its aim, which are decidedly deliberative in nature.
ISSN:1469-8145
Второстепенные работы:Enthalten in: New Testament studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0028688512000057