L'unità di Dio in Dionigi di Alessandria
The accusations made by Dionysius of Rome against his homonym of Alexandria are known through the quotations given by the Alexandrine in his Elenchus kai Apologia, a work no longer extant but from which Athanasius borrowed those quotations on which he also commented. Some years ago, however, L. Abra...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 电子 文件 |
| 语言: | Italian |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Ed. Pontificia Univ. Gregoriana
1991
|
| In: |
Gregorianum
Year: 1991, 卷: 72, 发布: 3, Pages: 459-490 |
| 在线阅读: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| 总结: | The accusations made by Dionysius of Rome against his homonym of Alexandria are known through the quotations given by the Alexandrine in his Elenchus kai Apologia, a work no longer extant but from which Athanasius borrowed those quotations on which he also commented. Some years ago, however, L. Abramowski has launched the opinion that the fragments quoted by Athanasius would not be authentic. The reading of the texts quoted leads the author of the present article to the contrary persuasion. Moreover, the analysis to which the texts are subjected here corroborates his conclusion. Hence the study of the "Eternity of begetting", "Light from Light", "Breath and emanation", "The Son as work of the Father", "The Son consubstantial with the Father". Starting from the quotations of Athanasius it is possible to recover the doctrine de Dionysius of Alexandria, by comparing it with the theses of Origen. Answering to the Roman, preoccupied with the possible danger of tritheism, the Alexandrine, concerned with the unity even in his antimonarchianist tendency, insists on the non-temporaliy of the begetting of the Son. He does so through the use of many traditional examples of which he is careful to avoid the ambiguity. |
|---|---|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Gregorianum
|