Partnership Remembered: Erets Canaan as Co-Provider and Co-Enforcer in H
The article contrasts two views of "land" in two texts which both originated in priestly circles. The first text is the Priestly creation narrative, and here the article leans heavily on the work of Norman Habel and the Earth Bible Project. For Habel, Genesis 1 is the story of the loss of...
| Другие заглавия: | Festschrift for Willie van Heerden |
|---|---|
| Главный автор: | |
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Unisa Press
2021
|
| В: |
Journal for semitics
Год: 2021, Том: 30, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 1-21 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Canaan
/ Israel (Antiquity)
/ ernähren
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | BH Иудаизм HB Ветхий Завет |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Earth Bible Project
B Anthropocentrism B Partnership B Genesis 1 B Holiness Legislation |
| Online-ссылка: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Итог: | The article contrasts two views of "land" in two texts which both originated in priestly circles. The first text is the Priestly creation narrative, and here the article leans heavily on the work of Norman Habel and the Earth Bible Project. For Habel, Genesis 1 is the story of the loss of partnership between God and Earth. The article then describes the portrayal of the "land of Canaan" or "Erets Canaan" in the Holiness Legislation and shows how the old partnership is remembered and rekindled. In the second part of the article the earlier work of Esias Meyer is used. The objective of this article is to contrast these two views of relationship to land and to make clear that the Holiness Legislation is much less anthropocentric than its Priestly predecessor in Genesis 1. |
|---|---|
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Journal for semitics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.25159/2663-6573/9070 |