The `Qualitative' Versus `Quantitative' Research Debate: A Question of Metaphorical Assumptions?
A great deal of criticism has been aimed at empirical-analytic research because of its narrow focus. However, a similar criticism can be leveled at qualitative research. The purpose of this manuscript is not to champion one approach at the expense of the other, but rather to focus on discussing the...
| Главные авторы: | ; ; ; |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Proquest
2000
|
| В: |
International journal of value-based management
Год: 2000, Том: 13, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 189-197 |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Objectivism
B social world B Methodology B Subjectivism B Research B Metaphor B Dualism |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Итог: | A great deal of criticism has been aimed at empirical-analytic research because of its narrow focus. However, a similar criticism can be leveled at qualitative research. The purpose of this manuscript is not to champion one approach at the expense of the other, but rather to focus on discussing the assumptions of each methodological approach in terms of metaphorical thinking. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1572-8528 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: International journal of value-based management
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1023/A:1007850027589 |