Truth or Diplomacy? For the Life of the World, Islam and the Patristic Approach

In their writings on Islam, John Damascene and Theodore Abu Qurrah, both authoritative patristic saints of the Orthodox Church, took an apologetic and polemic stand in defence of the Christian truth. In the modern interreligious discourse, however, the approach to Islam is rather diplomatic, concent...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:  
Библиографические подробности
Главный автор: Seppälä, Serafim 1970- (Автор)
Формат: Электронный ресурс Статья
Язык:Английский
Проверить наличие: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Загрузка...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Опубликовано: [publisher not identified] 2021
В: Review of ecumenical studies, Sibiu
Год: 2021, Том: 13, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 31-41
Индексация IxTheo:BJ Ислам
CC Христианство и нехристианские религии; Межрелигиозные отношения
KAD Раннее средневековье
KDF Православная церковь
Другие ключевые слова:B Orthodox Church
B Theodore Abu Qurrah
B Interreligious Encounter
B Patristic
B Ислам (мотив)
B John Damascene
Online-ссылка: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Описание
Итог:In their writings on Islam, John Damascene and Theodore Abu Qurrah, both authoritative patristic saints of the Orthodox Church, took an apologetic and polemic stand in defence of the Christian truth. In the modern interreligious discourse, however, the approach to Islam is rather diplomatic, concentrating on universal human values and common aspects of religions. How does the document For the Life of the World operate in this tension? In general, it aims to build on patristic argumentation, but the approach to Islam is most positive and all-embracing, welcoming the "beauty and truths" of Islam and stressing the "common roots," while the patristic views on Islam are silenced. The discrepancy may arouse questions on the sincerity and coherence of the modern approach in relation to the patristic tradition. This reflects wider challenges in the modern theology of the Church: how to find a discursive position in the tension between the defence of truth, characteristic for the patristic thought, and the "diplomatic" language of the modern interreligious encounters.
ISSN:2359-8107
Второстепенные работы:Enthalten in: Review of ecumenical studies, Sibiu
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2478/ress-2021-0003