Dating Luke-Acts Further Arguments for an Early Date

Alexander Mittelstaedt (2005) has provided new impetus to a long-standing opinion that Luke-Acts was written in the early 60s of the first century AD. Karl L. Armstrong (2017) provides a recent overview of the dating debate and argues that an early date makes best sense of the extensive evidence. Th...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Seccombe, David Peter (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado em: Tyndale House 2020
Em: Tyndale bulletin
Ano: 2020, Volume: 71, Número: 2, Páginas: 207-227
Outras palavras-chave:B luke
B Synoptic Gospels
B Gospels
B Dating
B Acts
B New Testament
B luke-acts
Acesso em linha: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Parallel Edition:Não eletrônico
Descrição
Resumo:Alexander Mittelstaedt (2005) has provided new impetus to a long-standing opinion that Luke-Acts was written in the early 60s of the first century AD. Karl L. Armstrong (2017) provides a recent overview of the dating debate and argues that an early date makes best sense of the extensive evidence. This paper suggests three considerations arising from the historical character of the rest of the century which support Mittelstaedt’s and Armstrong’s view. The first: AD 66-98 was a time of intense anti-Jewish sentiment, in which articulation of the nationalistic Jewish hopes expressed in the third Gospel and Acts would have been dangerous, and unlikely for a careful author. Second, it was also a time that ill accords with Acts’ assumption of Jewish legitimacy and its plea for the acceptance of Gentile Christianity. Third, the attention given to the voyage as Acts draws to its conclusion bespeaks an author who knew nothing of the cataclysmic avalanche of events that took place from AD 62-70.
ISSN:0082-7118
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: Tyndale bulletin
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.53751/001c.27747