The Passive apokatēllágēte in P46 and B03 Colossians 1:22a: An Original Grammatical Anomaly or Another Case of Scribal Assimilation?

Colossians 1:22a has one of the most challenging textual variants in the Pauline corpus regarding the form of the verb ἀποκαταλλάσσειν. The two competing readings are the active ἀποκατήλλαξεν, which is the reading of the majority of manuscripts, and the passive ἀποκαταλ[..]γητε/ἀποκατηλλάγητε, found...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Araújo, Diego dy Carlos (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Tyndale House 2022
In: Tyndale bulletin
Year: 2022, Volume: 73, Pages: 23-44
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B P.Beatty II / Codex Vaticanus / Colossians / Textual criticism
IxTheo Classification:HC New Testament
Further subjects:B Textual Criticism
B Bibel. Römerbrief, 5,10
B p46
B vaticanus
B colossians
B Epistles
B Bibel. Kolosserbrief, 1,22
B paul
B New Testament
B scribal assimilation
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:Colossians 1:22a has one of the most challenging textual variants in the Pauline corpus regarding the form of the verb ἀποκαταλλάσσειν. The two competing readings are the active ἀποκατήλλαξεν, which is the reading of the majority of manuscripts, and the passive ἀποκαταλ[..]γητε/ἀποκατηλλάγητε, found in P46 and B03, two of the most important manuscripts of the New Testament. Although the latter results in a ‘grammatical anomaly’, it is the _lectio difficilior_, and, therefore, many argue that it is the only reading that reasonably explains the emergence of the others. I argue that the reading of the majority of witnesses should be accepted as the earliest attainable text on both external and internal grounds; however, scholars who support this approach have been challenged to present an explanation for the origin of the passive reading in P46 and B03. This article provides such a hypothesis, proposing that the P46/B03 reading can be reasonably explained by an unconscious assimilation (or harmonisation) of the near-parallel passage in Romans 5:10.
ISSN:0082-7118
Contains:Enthalten in: Tyndale bulletin
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.53751/001c.35902