On the history and the history-making of the early Yogācāra Buddhism in China

For decades, modern scholars depicted early Yogācāra Buddhism in China by categorizing it into three discrete scholastic groups, namely the Northern Dilun faction, the Southern Dilun faction, and the Shelun faction. Supposedly, each faction represents an idiosyncratic understanding of Yogācāra Buddh...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Qi, Guanxiong (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2022
In: Studies in Chinese Religions
Year: 2022, Volume: 8, Issue: 2, Pages: 238-258
Further subjects:B Six Dynasties Buddhism
B Historiography
B Yogācāra Buddhism
B Chinese Buddhist history
B Shelun
B Dilun
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:For decades, modern scholars depicted early Yogācāra Buddhism in China by categorizing it into three discrete scholastic groups, namely the Northern Dilun faction, the Southern Dilun faction, and the Shelun faction. Supposedly, each faction represents an idiosyncratic understanding of Yogācāra Buddhism, and there were many doctrinal conflicts between these factions for contending with orthodoxy. In this article, I will re-examine this schist narrative and highlight some of its unstable presuppositions. I argue these designations of early Yogācāra factions are prejudiced outsiders’ projections that do not reflect any accurate historical circumstance. The modern constructed history of the Dilun-Shelun schism only exists under the modern history-making enterprise as a compromised sectarian narrative of the Chinese Buddhist past. In the end, I suggest we shall abandon the ‘factional discourse’ and focus on discursive studies of Buddhist historiographies.
ISSN:2372-9996
Contains:Enthalten in: Studies in Chinese Religions
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/23729988.2022.2091375