Source Criticism and the Reconstruction of Reality A Reply to Brigitte Schoen and Hubert Seiwert
This paper responds to criticism of our earlier work on the German anticult debate by Ms. Schoen and Prof. Dr. Seiwert. In it we argue that Schoen misunderstood and misread our article as a result of her obsession with published texts. Both Schoen and Seiwert underestimate the importance of history...
| VerfasserInnen: | ; |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
University of Californiarnia Press
2002
|
| In: |
Nova religio
Jahr: 2002, Band: 6, Heft: 1, Seiten: 129-136 |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallele Ausgabe: | Nicht-Elektronisch
|
| Zusammenfassung: | This paper responds to criticism of our earlier work on the German anticult debate by Ms. Schoen and Prof. Dr. Seiwert. In it we argue that Schoen misunderstood and misread our article as a result of her obsession with published texts. Both Schoen and Seiwert underestimate the importance of history in creating the ethos that shapes the German debate about new religions. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1541-8480 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Nova religio
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1525/nr.2002.6.1.129 |