Reading Talmudic Sources as Arguments: The Case of Water Used by a Baker
By discussing a short sugya, this paper demonstrates how to read the components of a typical Talmudic discussion – Mishnah, Tosefta, Yerushalmi and Bavli – as arguments. In contrast to widely used academic approaches, I show that it is possible to ascribe disagreement to parallel sources without pas...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Brill
2022
|
| In: |
The review of rabbinic Judaism
Jahr: 2022, Band: 25, Heft: 2, Seiten: 171-194 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Synoptic Problem
B Hermeneutics B Quentin Skinner B Rabbinic Literature |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Zusammenfassung: | By discussing a short sugya, this paper demonstrates how to read the components of a typical Talmudic discussion – Mishnah, Tosefta, Yerushalmi and Bavli – as arguments. In contrast to widely used academic approaches, I show that it is possible to ascribe disagreement to parallel sources without passing judgment either on their chronological order or on whether one of the sources is a direct response to the other. The appendix offers a new theoretical model for approaching the synoptic problem in rabbinic literature. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0704 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: The review of rabbinic Judaism
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700704-12341396 |