Challenging the two-source hypothesis
In view of the fact that the two-source hypothesis as solution to the synoptic problem is not generally accepted, and further in view of the fact that the proponents of the Griesbach hypothesis are literarily quite active, this article weighs up the two hypotheses against each other, making particul...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
NTWSA
1996
|
| In: |
Neotestamentica
Year: 1996, Volume: 30, Issue: 1, Pages: 89-101 |
| Further subjects: | B
Theology
B Synoptic Problem B Mark B Christianity |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | In view of the fact that the two-source hypothesis as solution to the synoptic problem is not generally accepted, and further in view of the fact that the proponents of the Griesbach hypothesis are literarily quite active, this article weighs up the two hypotheses against each other, making particular use of two commentaries on Mark which were written by Griesbach proponents, namely Mann (1986) and Riley (1989). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2518-4628 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Neotestamentica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.10520/AJA2548356_433 |