Reading Talmudic Sources as Arguments: The Case of Water Used by a Baker
By discussing a short sugya, this paper demonstrates how to read the components of a typical Talmudic discussion – Mishnah, Tosefta, Yerushalmi and Bavli – as arguments. In contrast to widely used academic approaches, I show that it is possible to ascribe disagreement to parallel sources without pas...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Φόρτωση...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Έκδοση: |
Brill
2022
|
| Στο/Στη: |
The review of rabbinic Judaism
Έτος: 2022, Τόμος: 25, Τεύχος: 2, Σελίδες: 171-194 |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Synoptic Problem
B Hermeneutics B Quentin Skinner B Rabbinic Literature |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Σύνοψη: | By discussing a short sugya, this paper demonstrates how to read the components of a typical Talmudic discussion – Mishnah, Tosefta, Yerushalmi and Bavli – as arguments. In contrast to widely used academic approaches, I show that it is possible to ascribe disagreement to parallel sources without passing judgment either on their chronological order or on whether one of the sources is a direct response to the other. The appendix offers a new theoretical model for approaching the synoptic problem in rabbinic literature. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0704 |
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: The review of rabbinic Judaism
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700704-12341396 |