Reading Talmudic Sources as Arguments: The Case of Water Used by a Baker
By discussing a short sugya, this paper demonstrates how to read the components of a typical Talmudic discussion – Mishnah, Tosefta, Yerushalmi and Bavli – as arguments. In contrast to widely used academic approaches, I show that it is possible to ascribe disagreement to parallel sources without pas...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Brill
2022
|
Dans: |
The review of rabbinic Judaism
Année: 2022, Volume: 25, Numéro: 2, Pages: 171-194 |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Synoptic Problem
B Hermeneutics B Quentin Skinner B Rabbinic Literature |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | By discussing a short sugya, this paper demonstrates how to read the components of a typical Talmudic discussion – Mishnah, Tosefta, Yerushalmi and Bavli – as arguments. In contrast to widely used academic approaches, I show that it is possible to ascribe disagreement to parallel sources without passing judgment either on their chronological order or on whether one of the sources is a direct response to the other. The appendix offers a new theoretical model for approaching the synoptic problem in rabbinic literature. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1570-0704 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: The review of rabbinic Judaism
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700704-12341396 |