Reading Talmudic Sources as Arguments: The Case of Water Used by a Baker
By discussing a short sugya, this paper demonstrates how to read the components of a typical Talmudic discussion – Mishnah, Tosefta, Yerushalmi and Bavli – as arguments. In contrast to widely used academic approaches, I show that it is possible to ascribe disagreement to parallel sources without pas...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
Idioma: | Inglês |
Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado em: |
Brill
2022
|
Em: |
The review of rabbinic Judaism
Ano: 2022, Volume: 25, Número: 2, Páginas: 171-194 |
Outras palavras-chave: | B
Synoptic Problem
B Hermeneutics B Quentin Skinner B Rabbinic Literature |
Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Resumo: | By discussing a short sugya, this paper demonstrates how to read the components of a typical Talmudic discussion – Mishnah, Tosefta, Yerushalmi and Bavli – as arguments. In contrast to widely used academic approaches, I show that it is possible to ascribe disagreement to parallel sources without passing judgment either on their chronological order or on whether one of the sources is a direct response to the other. The appendix offers a new theoretical model for approaching the synoptic problem in rabbinic literature. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1570-0704 |
Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: The review of rabbinic Judaism
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700704-12341396 |