An Ecumenical Account of Categorical Moral Reasons

According to an influential way of understanding the debate between internalism and externalism about normative reasons, these theories confront us with a dilemma. Internalism is taken to involve a view about rationality which is considered less philosophically problematic than its competitors, wher...

全面介紹

Saved in:  
書目詳細資料
主要作者: Strandberg, Caj (Author)
格式: 電子 Article
語言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
載入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: Brill 2019
In: Journal of moral philosophy
Year: 2019, 卷: 16, 發布: 2, Pages: 160-188
Further subjects:B categorical moral reasons
B Internalism
B Externalism
B Normative reasons
B Practical rationality
在線閱讀: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1817471007
003 DE-627
005 20220927052956.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220927s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/17455243-20170009  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1817471007 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1817471007 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Strandberg, Caj  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a An Ecumenical Account of Categorical Moral Reasons 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a According to an influential way of understanding the debate between internalism and externalism about normative reasons, these theories confront us with a dilemma. Internalism is taken to involve a view about rationality which is considered less philosophically problematic than its competitors, whereas externalism is taken to suggest a more contentious view concerning this notion. However, the assumption that externalism involves a more demanding notion of rationality implies that it is able to account for categorical moral reasons, whereas internalism is unable to do so. In this paper, I outline an ecumenical view about normative reasons which involves the same notion of rationality as internalism, at the same time as it is able to account for categorical moral reasons. Thus, it evades the dilemma. 
650 4 |a categorical moral reasons 
650 4 |a Practical rationality 
650 4 |a Externalism 
650 4 |a Internalism 
650 4 |a Normative reasons 
650 4 |a categorical moral reasons 
650 4 |a Practical rationality 
650 4 |a Externalism 
650 4 |a Internalism 
650 4 |a Normative reasons 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of moral philosophy  |d Leiden : Brill, 2004  |g 16(2019), 2, Seite 160-188  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)474382281  |w (DE-600)2169771-1  |w (DE-576)273875329  |x 1745-5243  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:16  |g year:2019  |g number:2  |g pages:160-188 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-20170009  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/16/2/article-p160_160.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 16  |j 2019  |e 2  |h 160-188 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4192064006 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1817471007 
LOK |0 005 20220927052956 
LOK |0 008 220927||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-23#7413569C45543BAD135FA9E8DF317730E46B9064 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw